We'll kick off this blog with a little quiz question. From the following list, which consists of some of the greatest men to have graced our country's national game and who have deservedly received Knighthood's, I would like you to point out who's name shouldn't actually be there; Sir Alex Ferguson, Sir Bobby Charlton, Sir Matt Busby, Sir Stanley Matthews, and Sir Charlie Adam.
![]() |
| The Legitimate 'Sirs' of British Football |
The player I suspect you all plumped for (correct answer is at the bottom of the post) is Charlie Adam. There won't of been too much deliberation; you will probably have taken into account the fact that the other listees have achieved some of the greatest accolades football has to offer, and Mr Adam, well he hasn't achieved too much at all. OK, he captained a poor club to promotion into the English Premiership, scoring a few important goals on the way (including the equalising goal in the Play-Offs against Cardiff City), but does that amount to a potential Knighthood? I don't think so, and realistically, Ian Holloway doesn't either.
This blog stems from Holloway's comments last year, on the back of Blackpool's promotion to the Premiership (and a few too many shandies I suspect). He stated, "Blackpool fans idolise good people, like Sir Jimmy Armfield and Sir Stanley Matthews. I'm sure Charlie will be a Sir one day and follow in the footsteps of these legendary club figures."
![]() |
| Charlie Adam: Knighthood Beckoning? |
But why has this happened? How can a player who was so average in the SPL, a league lagging far behind that of it's English counterpart, now be held in such high regard down south? I would suggest there are a number of possible reasons. For example, he may be more suited to the English game. You get more time on the ball, and it is assumed that the players in the EPL are better than those North of the border; both of which would suit Adam's style of play. He is often seen to gather the ball in the middle of the pitch, slowly move a yard or two, before unleashing an immaculate pass into the path of one of his players.
Another explanation could be his age. He was only a youngster at Rangers FC, now aged 25, he may be more comfortable mentally. It is also generally understood that a player peaks roughly between the ages of 26 and 29, which means Adam is on the verge of playing his best years in the game.
![]() |
| Ian Holloway has worked wonders at Blackpool FC |
It's always hard to determine the reasoning behind a players sudden flurry of form (Diego Forlan before > after). It may be a combination of the above three suggestions, it may be something else completely, but what's for sure is that Charlie Adam has truly blossomed into an important player in the Premiership, and hopefully, for the Scottish National Team in the future.
Eb....
Answer: Sir Charlie Adam - He is not a 'Sir' and probably never will be.



I think Ian Holloway has had a major impact on Adam, to the point that he waited and waited to get his man as he dithered over whether to leave his boyhood heroes.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I think the real reason for Adam's progress is the fact that he is free from the pressure he was under in Glasgow. Rangers are a massive club, with great pressure on the side week to week. The fear of losing is huge and that transfers to the terraces.
Adam, as a product of Murray Park, was under pressure to succeed. The fact that his early form was shakey, and that he looked cumbersome, meant that he was branded overweight and not fit for purpose. Every loose pas was met with grumbles and sighs. It hindered him.
Adam saw leaving Rangers as a massive wrench, yet it has been the making of him.
The £500K Holloway spent on him looks to be the best purchase by a British club in a long time.
Tommi